Solved

In CASE 11

Question 30

Multiple Choice

In CASE 11.1 DC Comics v.Towle (2016) ,the court addressed the question of whether the production of replicas of a copyrighted item featured in a movie infringed the copyright owner's rights.How did the court rule?


A) DC Comics did not own a copyright interest in those productions so DC Comics lacked standing to bring the claim against Towle.
B) Towle was liable for infringing DC Comics' exclusive right to produce derivative works of the Batmobile character.
C) The Batmobile was "merely a stock character" and as a result,did not qualify for copyright protection.
D) Towle's replica Batmobiles were an indirect copy of the Batmobile character and therefore did not infringe on DC Comics' copyright.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents