In CASE 11.1 DC Comics v.Towle (2016) ,the court addressed the question of whether the production of replicas of a copyrighted item featured in a movie infringed the copyright owner's rights.How did the court rule?
A) DC Comics did not own a copyright interest in those productions so DC Comics lacked standing to bring the claim against Towle.
B) Towle was liable for infringing DC Comics' exclusive right to produce derivative works of the Batmobile character.
C) The Batmobile was "merely a stock character" and as a result,did not qualify for copyright protection.
D) Towle's replica Batmobiles were an indirect copy of the Batmobile character and therefore did not infringe on DC Comics' copyright.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Which of the following is NOT a
Q26: The Bilski v.Kappos case involved a question
Q27: In the case Association for Molecular Pathology
Q28: The term "golden arches" has a(n)_,because the
Q29: What type of efficiency exists when competition
Q31: A(n)_ infringement occurs when one party knowingly
Q32: The federal trademark act is known as
Q33: What are the four basic types of
Q34: A(n)_ mark is a real word whose
Q35: The duration of a copyright granted to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents