Mo owns a business that makes kites.Mo's agent Baez entered into an agreement with Val to purchase some land for a new kite factory.Mo's agency relationship with Baez was not memorialized by any writing.The day after Baez signs the papers finalizing the sale,Mo learned of the purchase,was furious with Baez,and wanted out of the deal.Assuming that Baez was legally considered the agent of Mo in making the purchase,which of the following is Mo's best argument?
A) That the agency agreement with Baez was not in writing and that under the equal dignities rule Mo should not be bound.
B) That agency agreements may not extend to the purchase of land.
C) That under the exclusion principle,Baez was not authorized to purchase land unless expressly authorized by Mo.
D) That Mo did not need land and therefore should not be bound because Baez was mistaken.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: In CASE 5.2,Northeast General Corp.v.Wellington Advertising,Inc.(1993),the plaintiff
Q44: Sam is an employee of Binky,Inc.While delivering
Q45: When ruling on a case involving contracts,the
Q46: Which of the following is true regarding
Q47: The relationship of an independent contractor who
Q49: Yummy Foods contracts with Quinn to retile
Q50: Which of the following is NOT usually
Q51: Which of the following terms refers to
Q52: In the past,Gale,acting as a purchasing agent
Q53: Marley wants to buy a vacant lot
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents