The central Fourth Amendment question in the case of Board of Education of Independent School District No.92 of Pottawatomie County v.Earls,which involved drug testing of student athletes,was answered as follows:
A) individualized suspicion is a consideration in determining whether a search is reasonable and the searches at issue were,therefore,unconstitutional.
B) the searches were unconstitutional because of the nature of privacy.
C) the searches were constitutional because minors were involved and individual suspicion was present.
D) individualized suspicion is not always required and the searches in the case were constitutional.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: In the case United States v.Lopez,the U.S.Supreme
Q19: Procedural due process focuses on the fundamental
Q20: Racist speech is protected by the First
Q21: In contrast to the federal government,state governments
Q22: Laws that punish actions that were not
Q24: Based on various Supreme Court rulings,provisions in
Q25: CASE 4.3 Brown v.Entertainment Merchants Association (2011)involved
Q26: In the case United States v.Morrison referenced
Q27: Which of the following guarantees of individual
Q28: In order to hold a media defendant
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents