In deciding the case,Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission,in which the constitutionality of the federal law providing that televised electioneering communications funded by anyone other than a candidate must include a disclaimer setting forth identifying information as to sponsorship,the Supreme Court ruled that:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court ruled that the federal law requiring a disclaimer for televised electioneering communications funded by anyone other than a candidate was constitutional, meaning that option D is the correct answer. The Court held specifically that corporations and unions had the right to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns and that the government could not restrict this spending, as it would constitute a violation of the First Amendment. Therefore the disclaimer requirement could not be upheld.

In Deciding the Case,Citizens United V