In Shaw v. Reno, the Court ruled that congressional districts drawn principally on the basis of race are unconstitutional, thus promoting the idea of:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Court's ruling in Shaw v. Reno promoted the idea of color-blind jurisprudence, which holds that the government should not make distinctions based on race in its policies or decision-making. This approach stands in contrast to affirmative action, which seeks to promote diversity and remedy past discrimination through race-conscious initiatives. The Court's decision in Shaw also applied strict scrutiny, a high level of judicial review that requires the government to show a compelling interest and narrowly tailored means in justifying racial classifications.

In Shaw V Reno, the Court Ruled That Congressional Districts Drawn Principally