Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Psychology
Study Set
Think Critically
Quiz 17: The Logic of Declarative Statements
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 21
Short Answer
Explain why an argument may fail to be valid at the level of the Logic of Statements, but might be discovered to be valid a deeper analytical level. The Logic of Statements is valuable for determining that a certain set of arguments is valid provided that the validity depends on the grammatical relationships between simple statements. But, as we saw in the chapter entitled "Valid Inferences," the validity of some arguments depends on relationships among classes of objects and their members, and it gives examples of valid inferences based on relationships between individuals, such as transitivity and reflexivity. The examples in those sections of that chapter would not be valid in the Logic of Statements.
Question 22
Short Answer
Compose a conjunction in English from these two simple statements: "We took Grandfather's advice." And "We had a great time." Let the first one be "p" and the second by "q" and translate the conjunction into symbolic logic.
Question 23
Short Answer
Statements A and B are __________________ in the Logic of Statements if, and only if, the bi-conditional (A ≡ B) is a tautology.
Question 24
Essay
What is a simple declarative statement?
Question 25
Short Answer
________________ language is much richer than the notational language of the Logic of Declarative Statements. We can express only a limited range of the logical power of natural language using the tilde, ampersand, wedge, arrow, and triple bar.
Question 26
Essay
Using "only if" compose a conditional in English from these two simple statements: "We took Grandfather's advice." And "We had a great time." Let the first one be "p" and the second by "q" and translate the conjunction into symbolic logic.
Question 27
Essay
Figure out "Who ate the Pizza?" and explain the answer. The Puzzle: Five roommates, Abe, Bob, Carl, Dave, and Ziggy, share an off-campus apartment. On Monday night they had leftover pizza and so they put it in the refrigerator. On Tuesday when Ziggy went to get some of that pizza he found that it had all been eaten. Later Ziggy confronted his four roommates to find out who ate the pizza. Each roommate made one statement. The person who ate the pizza lied; his statement is false. The other three statements are true. Which one ate the pizza? Here are their four statements: Abe: I was in class all day. Bob: Carl ate the pizza. Carl: Bob's statement is false. David: Carl's statement is true.
Question 28
True/False
An argument is valid at the level of the Logic of Statements if the conditional formed by the conjunction of its premises as the antecedent and the conclusion as its consequent is a tautology.
Question 29
Essay
Analyze the logic relationship called Disjunction and diagram a "Logic Circuit" with a power source and a light bulb that shows the conditions under which the light will be lit and not lit.
Question 30
Short Answer
Statements A and statement B are __________________ in the Logic of Statements if A and B have the same truth value under every interpretation of their statement letters.
Question 31
Essay
Accurately and elegantly translate ((p → s) & (s → t)). Use these interpretations of the statement letters: p = "My son has chickenpox." q = "I have to stay home from work." r = "I need to take care of my son." s = "My son is contagious." t = "I need to call my boss."
Question 32
True/False
Two statements are equivalent at the level of the Logic of Statements if the bi-conditional of the two is a tautology.
Question 33
Essay
Accurately and elegantly translate (~s → (~p & (~r & ~t))). Use these interpretations of the statement letters: p = "My son has chickenpox." q = "I have to stay home from work." r = "I need to take care of my son." s = "My son is contagious." t = "I need to call my boss."
Question 34
Essay
At the level of the Logic of Statements, a tautology is implied by any statement and an inconsistent statement implies any statement. Moreover, any two tautologies or any two self-contradictory statements are equivalent. With regard to implication and equivalence, how should we resolve the differences between the treatment of these concepts in the Logic of Statements and how these same concepts apply in everyday real-world discourse?
Question 35
Essay
Construct the truth table that defines negation.
Question 36
True/False
A tautology is a grammatically correct expression that turns out to be true under every possible assignment of truth values to its component simple statements.
Question 37
Essay
Construct the truth table for ((~(r → p) v (~p → r)) v q). Based on the truth table, correctly characterize the formula as tautology, inconsistent, or contingent. Explain the basis for the characterization.
Question 38
Essay
Construct the truth table that defines the conditional.
Question 39
Short Answer
If a natural language statement is translated into symbolic logic and its truth table ends up with a T on at least one row and an F on at least one row, then the statement can be characterized as _____________.