According to Groh v.Ramirez an officer is
A) not entitled to official immunity if "it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was lawful in the situation he confronted."
B) entitled to official immunity if "it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was unlawful in the situation he confronted."
C) not entitled to qualified immunity if "it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was unlawful in the situation he confronted."
D) entitled to qualified immunity if "it would be clear to a reasonable officer that his conduct was unlawful in the situation he confronted."
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Which of the following is NOT one
Q20: The two categories of types of force
Q21: Besides proving that a defendant was acting
Q22: Which of the following are defenses used
Q23: A single act by the police can
Q25: Battery is
A)the intentional causing of an apprehension
Q26: In which case did the Supreme Court
Q27: Which defense,in Section 1983 cases,holds that the
Q28: The Court has ruled that in cases
Q29: The main purpose of the exclusionary rule
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents