Solved

Here Are Data About the Average January Low Temperature in Cities

Question 6

Essay

Here are data about the average January low temperature in cities in the United States, and factors that might allow us to
predict temperature. The data, available for 55 cities, include:  Here are data about the average January low temperature in cities in the United States, and factors that might allow us to predict temperature. The data, available for 55 cities, include:   We will attempt to make a regression model to help account for mean January temperature and to understand the effects of the various predictors. At each step of the analysis you may assume that things learned earlier in the process are known. Units Note: The  degrees  of temperature, given here on the Fahrenheit scale, have only coincidental language relationship to the  degrees  of longitude and latitude. The geographic  degrees  are based on modeling the Earth as a sphere and dividing it up into 360 degrees for a full circle. Thus 180 degrees of longitude is halfway around the world from Greenwich, England (0°) and Latitude increases from 0 degrees at the Equator to 90 degrees of (North) latitude at the North Pole.   -It is possible that the distance that a city is from the ocean could affect its average January low temperature. Coast gives an approximate distance of each city from the East Coast or West Coast (whichever is nearer). Including it in the regression yields the following regression table: Dependent variable is:JanTemp R squared  = 87.6 \% \quad \mathrm { R }  squared (adjusted)  = 86.9 \%   s = 4.878  with  55 - 4 = 51  degrees of freedom  \begin{array}{lllcc} \text { Source } & \text { Sum of Squares } & \text { df } & \text { Mean Square } & \text { F-ratio } \\ \text { Regression } 8611.86 & 3 & 2870.62 & 121 \\ \text { Residual } & 1213.67 & 51 & 23.7974 & \end{array}    \begin{array}{lclll} \text { Variable } & \text { Coefficient } & \text { SE }(\text { Coeff }) & \text { t-ratio } & \text { P-value } \\ \text { Intercept } & 111.878 & 6.167 & 18.1 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Lat } & -2.47722 & 0.1307 & -19.0 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Long } & 0.221997 & 0.0462 & 4.81 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Coast } & -0.674929 & 0.0901 & -7.49 & \leq 0.0001 \end{array}   And here is a scatterplot of the residuals:    \text { Write a report on this regression. Interpret the coefficients and } R ^ { 2 } \text {. Are the conditions met? } We will attempt to make a regression model to help account for mean January temperature and to understand the effects of
the various predictors.
At each step of the analysis you may assume that things learned earlier in the process are known.
Units Note: The "degrees" of temperature, given here on the Fahrenheit scale, have only coincidental language relationship to
the "degrees" of longitude and latitude. The geographic "degrees" are based on modeling the Earth as a sphere and dividing it
up into 360 degrees for a full circle. Thus 180 degrees of longitude is halfway around the world from Greenwich, England
(0°) and Latitude increases from 0 degrees at the Equator to 90 degrees of (North) latitude at the North Pole.  Here are data about the average January low temperature in cities in the United States, and factors that might allow us to predict temperature. The data, available for 55 cities, include:   We will attempt to make a regression model to help account for mean January temperature and to understand the effects of the various predictors. At each step of the analysis you may assume that things learned earlier in the process are known. Units Note: The  degrees  of temperature, given here on the Fahrenheit scale, have only coincidental language relationship to the  degrees  of longitude and latitude. The geographic  degrees  are based on modeling the Earth as a sphere and dividing it up into 360 degrees for a full circle. Thus 180 degrees of longitude is halfway around the world from Greenwich, England (0°) and Latitude increases from 0 degrees at the Equator to 90 degrees of (North) latitude at the North Pole.   -It is possible that the distance that a city is from the ocean could affect its average January low temperature. Coast gives an approximate distance of each city from the East Coast or West Coast (whichever is nearer). Including it in the regression yields the following regression table: Dependent variable is:JanTemp R squared  = 87.6 \% \quad \mathrm { R }  squared (adjusted)  = 86.9 \%   s = 4.878  with  55 - 4 = 51  degrees of freedom  \begin{array}{lllcc} \text { Source } & \text { Sum of Squares } & \text { df } & \text { Mean Square } & \text { F-ratio } \\ \text { Regression } 8611.86 & 3 & 2870.62 & 121 \\ \text { Residual } & 1213.67 & 51 & 23.7974 & \end{array}    \begin{array}{lclll} \text { Variable } & \text { Coefficient } & \text { SE }(\text { Coeff }) & \text { t-ratio } & \text { P-value } \\ \text { Intercept } & 111.878 & 6.167 & 18.1 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Lat } & -2.47722 & 0.1307 & -19.0 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Long } & 0.221997 & 0.0462 & 4.81 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Coast } & -0.674929 & 0.0901 & -7.49 & \leq 0.0001 \end{array}   And here is a scatterplot of the residuals:    \text { Write a report on this regression. Interpret the coefficients and } R ^ { 2 } \text {. Are the conditions met? }
-It is possible that the distance that a city is from the ocean could affect its average January
low temperature. Coast gives an approximate distance of each city from the East Coast or
West Coast (whichever is nearer). Including it in the regression yields the following
regression table: Dependent variable is:JanTemp
R squared =87.6%R= 87.6 \% \quad \mathrm { R } squared (adjusted) =86.9%= 86.9 \% s=4.878s = 4.878 with 554=5155 - 4 = 51 degrees of freedom
 Source  Sum of Squares  df  Mean Square  F-ratio  Regression 8611.8632870.62121 Residual 1213.675123.7974\begin{array}{lllcc}\text { Source } & \text { Sum of Squares } & \text { df } & \text { Mean Square } & \text { F-ratio } \\\text { Regression } 8611.86 & 3 & 2870.62 & 121 \\\text { Residual } & 1213.67 & 51 & 23.7974 &\end{array}

 Variable  Coefficient  SE ( Coeff ) t-ratio  P-value  Intercept 111.8786.16718.10.0001 Lat 2.477220.130719.00.0001 Long 0.2219970.04624.810.0001 Coast 0.6749290.09017.490.0001\begin{array}{lclll}\text { Variable } & \text { Coefficient } & \text { SE }(\text { Coeff }) & \text { t-ratio } & \text { P-value } \\\text { Intercept } & 111.878 & 6.167 & 18.1 & \leq 0.0001 \\\text { Lat } & -2.47722 & 0.1307 & -19.0 & \leq 0.0001 \\\text { Long } & 0.221997 & 0.0462 & 4.81 & \leq 0.0001 \\\text { Coast } & -0.674929 & 0.0901 & -7.49 & \leq 0.0001\end{array}
And here is a scatterplot of the residuals:  Here are data about the average January low temperature in cities in the United States, and factors that might allow us to predict temperature. The data, available for 55 cities, include:   We will attempt to make a regression model to help account for mean January temperature and to understand the effects of the various predictors. At each step of the analysis you may assume that things learned earlier in the process are known. Units Note: The  degrees  of temperature, given here on the Fahrenheit scale, have only coincidental language relationship to the  degrees  of longitude and latitude. The geographic  degrees  are based on modeling the Earth as a sphere and dividing it up into 360 degrees for a full circle. Thus 180 degrees of longitude is halfway around the world from Greenwich, England (0°) and Latitude increases from 0 degrees at the Equator to 90 degrees of (North) latitude at the North Pole.   -It is possible that the distance that a city is from the ocean could affect its average January low temperature. Coast gives an approximate distance of each city from the East Coast or West Coast (whichever is nearer). Including it in the regression yields the following regression table: Dependent variable is:JanTemp R squared  = 87.6 \% \quad \mathrm { R }  squared (adjusted)  = 86.9 \%   s = 4.878  with  55 - 4 = 51  degrees of freedom  \begin{array}{lllcc} \text { Source } & \text { Sum of Squares } & \text { df } & \text { Mean Square } & \text { F-ratio } \\ \text { Regression } 8611.86 & 3 & 2870.62 & 121 \\ \text { Residual } & 1213.67 & 51 & 23.7974 & \end{array}    \begin{array}{lclll} \text { Variable } & \text { Coefficient } & \text { SE }(\text { Coeff }) & \text { t-ratio } & \text { P-value } \\ \text { Intercept } & 111.878 & 6.167 & 18.1 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Lat } & -2.47722 & 0.1307 & -19.0 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Long } & 0.221997 & 0.0462 & 4.81 & \leq 0.0001 \\ \text { Coast } & -0.674929 & 0.0901 & -7.49 & \leq 0.0001 \end{array}   And here is a scatterplot of the residuals:    \text { Write a report on this regression. Interpret the coefficients and } R ^ { 2 } \text {. Are the conditions met? }
 Write a report on this regression. Interpret the coefficients and R2. Are the conditions met? \text { Write a report on this regression. Interpret the coefficients and } R ^ { 2 } \text {. Are the conditions met? }

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

This regression model seems to be an imp...

View Answer

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents