Dr. Parvik has been treating a college student for the last two years. After a recent session, believing he had relevant information about his client's learning disability, Dr. Parvik contacted the college office that specializes in helping students with this form of learning challenge. He felt comfortable providing information about his client because the client had signed a standard HIPAA consent form at his initial interview. In your opinion, which of the following is TRUE?
A) Dr. Parvik demonstrated good judgment in working in his client's best interests.
B) Dr. Parvik violated the client's right to confidentiality.
C) Dr. Parvik invoked the PAA clause in the HIPAA regulations.
D) HIPAA regulations would not apply in this case as it does not involve a mental illness.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: Dr. Colleen Gerson, a psychologist, is a
Q37: Among the changes to the M'Naghten Rule,
Q38: An advance directive permits
A) the medication of
Q39: A common misconception regarding NGRI is that
A)
Q40: A therapist cannot reveal certain information during
Q42: Currently, psychologists have prescription privileges in
A) no
Q43: In 1947, the _established fundamental directives for
Q44: Ranella was an 18 year-old college student
Q45: Professionals who hold licenses to practice therapy
Q46: The Nuremberg Code (1947) and the Declaration
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents