Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
Business Law Study Set 3
Quiz 43: Antitrust Law
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 61
Multiple Choice
With respect to antitrust violations, the Federal Trade Commission does not enforce
Question 62
Multiple Choice
Ranch Supplies Company believes that its chief competitor Stock & Equipment Inc. engages in anticompetitive behavior in an attempt to drive Ranch Supplies out of the market. Under the Clayton Act, Ranch Supplies can sue Stock & Equipment for a violation of
Question 63
Essay
Linking Cogs Corporation and Meshed Gears Inc. are competitors selling certain machine parts that are otherwise generally unattainable in their geographic market. This market includes the states of Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Linking Cogs and Meshed Gears agree that Linking Cogs will no longer sell in Minnesota and that Meshed Gears will no longer sell in North and South Dakota. Have Linking Cogs and Meshed Gears violated any antitrust law? If so, which one? Explain. If they had divided their market by type of customer rather than geographic are, would the result be the same? Why or why not?
Question 64
Multiple Choice
Baby Goods Inc. buys Child Shops Inc. in an attempt to gain monopoly power. Remedies that a court might impose in a suit against Baby Goods for a violation of the antitrust laws include
Question 65
Multiple Choice
American Oil Company joins a cartel that includes foreign participants to set the price of oil. The cartel has a substantial effect on U.S. commerce. With respect to the foreign participants, under U.S. antitrust laws, this is most likely
Question 66
Multiple Choice
With respect to anticompetitive behavior, the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits
Question 67
Multiple Choice
Say It Inc. and Text Talk Inc. are social media companies. They compete for employees, users, and advertisers. The two firms work together on security threats, however. With respect to antitrust law, this cooperation is most likely