Haskins is an officer of a real estate development firm. Haskins purchased a piece of property in a rural area of Arizona with the idea of building resort homes there. The firm has always had board resolutions for purchases of property (as is common practice) but there was no resolution for this property purchase. The other officers in the firm have learned of the value of the property and are concerned that the firm may not own the property. Which of the following statements is true?
A) The firm can ratify Haskin's actions and take over the contract.
B) The firm cannot ratify the contract unless Haskins had express authority to buy land.
C) If the firm ratifies the contract, the effect is that Haskins is released from liability on it.
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q69: A fiduciary is required to:
A)act in the
Q70: A pizza deliverer who is in an
Q71: Gilda Steinforth is a partner in the
Q72: Jan hires Duncan to act as her
Q72: Jane and Joseph Sechrist signed a contract
Q75: In which of the following situations does
Q76: Joe Helquist and Samantha Gillis were partners
Q77: In which of the following situations is
Q78: Alan Freeman and Bill Freeman, brothers, operated
Q100: Firing an agent terminates:
A)express authority.
B)implied authority.
C)apparent authority.
D)a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents