Alan Freeman and Bill Freeman, brothers, operated a residential construction firm. There were three divisions of the firm: single-family homes, townhomes, and custom homes. Alan did not enjoy the demands of custom home buyers and Bill did not enjoy the cookie-cutter work of the other divisions. The brothers agreed to split the business with Bill assuming the responsibilities and contracts of the custom home division and Alan handling the remaining divisions. Alan told Bill he could continue to use the company offices until he was able to find offices of his own. Bill met his clients at the company offices, used the plans of the company and even continued to use the company stationery. Three months later Bill left town, leaving custom homes unfinished and taking the deposits of three customers with him. The customers have sued Alan. Which of the following statements is true?
A) Alan is not liable since the relationship had been terminated.
B) Alan is liable because of apparent authority.
C) Bill is not liable because he was Alan's agent.
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q73: Haskins is an officer of a real
Q75: In which of the following situations does
Q76: Joe Helquist and Samantha Gillis were partners
Q77: In which of the following situations is
Q79: Principals are liable for the acts of
Q80: The purpose of anti-retaliation statutes is to
Q81: Which of the following terminates apparent authority?
A)Firing
Q82: Which of the following is not an
Q83: Dave Kartchner had rented a storage locker
Q100: Firing an agent terminates:
A)express authority.
B)implied authority.
C)apparent authority.
D)a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents