Question 1

A ruling of the highest court in State B may be mandatory precedent for the lower courts in State A.

Accepted Answer

The highest court in one state does not have mandatory precedent over the lower courts in another state. Each state has its own system of courts and sets its own precedent. However, the ruling of the highest court in State B may be persuasive authority for the lower courts in State A.

Question 2

A key criterion for a court opinion to be on point is that the key and background facts of the opinion are sufficiently similar to the key and background facts of the client's case.

Accepted Answer

False

Question 3

The terms precedent and on point are often used interchangeably.

Accepted Answer

True

Question 4

A case is precedent (on point)if there is a sufficient similarity between the key facts and rule of law or legal principle of the court opinion and the matter before the subsequent court.

Accepted Answer

This is the definition of precedent, which means that a court will often look to prior cases with similar facts and legal principles as a guide in deciding a current case.

Question 5

For a case to be on point, three requirements must be met.

Accepted Answer

The answer of For a case to be on point,...

Question 6

Stare decisis is an earlier court decision on an issue that governs or guides a subsequent court in its determination of an identical or similar issue based on identical or similar key facts.

Accepted Answer

The answer of Stare decisis is an earlier court decision...

Question 7

If the law applied in the court opinion is different from that which applies to the client's case, the court opinion cannot be mandatory precedent.

Accepted Answer

The law applied in a court opinion must be the same as the law that applies to the client's case for the court opinion to be considered mandatory precedent. If the laws are different, the court opinion would not be binding on the client's case.

Question 8

The determination of whether a case is on point must be made before the case may apply as precedent.

Accepted Answer

This statement is true. In order for a case to apply as precedent, it must be on point, meaning it must deal with the same or similar legal issues as the current case.

Question 9

A court opinion interpreting a common law rule or principle may apply as precedent for a client's case that requires the application of a different common law rule or principle.

Accepted Answer

This is because courts often rely on past precedent to make decisions on current cases. If a court has previously interpreted a common law rule or principle, that interpretation can be applied as precedent for similar cases in the future, even if a different rule or principle is at issue.

Question 10

Case law analysis is the process of determining if a court opinion governs or affects the outcome of a client's case.

Accepted Answer

Case law analysis involves the examination of past court decisions to determine their relevance and applicability to a current case, and whether they support or undermine a particular legal argument or position. It helps in predicting the likely outcome of a case and in developing effective legal strategies.

Question 11

If the rule or principle applied in the court opinion is the same rule or principle that applies in the client's case, the opinion is on point.

Accepted Answer

The answer of If the rule or principle applied in...

Question 12

When there is a major difference in the key facts of a court opinion and the key facts of the client's case, the opinion cannot be on point.

Accepted Answer

The answer of When there is a major difference in...

Question 13

Persuasive precedent must be followed by the lower courts in the jurisdiction.

Accepted Answer

The answer of Persuasive precedent must be followed by the...

Question 14

When the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, if substitution of the key facts would not result in changing the outcome of the case, the court opinion can be used as precedent.

Accepted Answer

If the key facts of the court opinion and the client's case are not similar, then the court opinion may still be used as precedent if substituting the key facts would not change the outcome of the case. This means that the legal reasoning and principles used by the court in its opinion could still be applicable to the client's case, even if the specific factual circumstances are different.

Question 15

For a case to be on point, the key and background facts of the court opinion must be sufficiently similar to the key and background facts of the client's case.

Accepted Answer

The answer of For a case to be on point,...

Question 16

A case that is on point should be analyzed to help the attorney determine what course of action to take.

Accepted Answer

A case that is on point can provide valuable insight into how a similar case may be handled in court. By analyzing the facts, legal reasoning, and outcome of the on point case, an attorney can make informed decisions about strategy, arguments, and potential outcomes in their own case.

Question 17

The doctrine of precedent is a basic principle of the common law system that requires a court to follow a previous decision of that court or a higher court in the jurisdiction when the current decision involves issues and key facts similar to those involved in the previous decision.

Accepted Answer

The answer of The doctrine of precedent is a basic...

Question 18

When the key facts of the court opinion and the key facts of the client's case are not similar, the court opinion may still be on point.

Accepted Answer

Even if the facts are not identical, there may still be legal principles or doctrines discussed in the court opinion that are relevant to the client's case.

Question 19

The phrase "on all fours" is used to describe an opinion when the facts of that opinion and those of the client's case and the rule of law that applies are identical or so similar that the court opinion is clearly on point.

Accepted Answer

The definition of "on all fours" is accurately described in the statement given.

Question 20

The determination of whether a case is on point is important because of the doctrines of precedent and stare decisis.

Accepted Answer

The doctrines of precedent and stare decisis rely on the determination of whether a case is on point. Precedent involves using previous cases to guide current decisions, while stare decisis involves following the decisions made in previous cases to maintain consistency and stability in the law. Therefore, determining whether a case is on point is crucial in applying these doctrines.

Quiz 8: Eastman Kodak Company Kodak: Film Vs Digital: Can Kodak Build a Bridge