Investigator A claims his results are statistically significant at the 10% level. Investigator B argue that significance should be announced only if the results are statistically significant at the 5% level. From this we can conclude
A) if investigator A has significant results at the 10% level, they will never be significant at the 5% level.
B) it will be more difficult for investigator A to reject the statistical null hypotheses if he always works at the 10% level compared with investigator B who works at the 5% level.
C) if investigator A has significant results at the 10% level, they will also be significant at the level.
D) it will be less difficult for investigator A to reject the statistical null hypotheses if he always works at the 10% level compared with investigator B, who works at the 5% level.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1584: As a member of the project team
Q1585: +In order to prevent the accidental introduction
Q1586: The CFO of your facility asks you
Q1587: You are the coding supervisor at a
Q1588: You have been asked to reduce your
Q1590: Carson surveyed members of AHIMA's student CoP
Q1591: Take a look at the comparison of
Q1592: You have been the supervisor in quality
Q1593: Evidence-based management and decision-making is an emerging
Q1594: As the Project Manager for the upcoming
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents