Question 1

A state case typically originates in a federal court.​

Accepted Answer

A state case usually originates in a state court, not a federal court.

Question 2

The amount in controversy in a diversity of citizenship case must be more than $1 million before a federal court can take jurisdiction.​

Accepted Answer

The amount in controversy requirement for a federal court to have jurisdiction in a diversity of citizenship case is more than $75,000, not $1 million.

Question 3

The United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in any case.​

Accepted Answer

The United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases involving disputes between states, cases involving ambassadors or other public ministers, and cases brought by one state against citizens of another state or against a foreign country.

Question 4

In many cases, a court can exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has done business in the state only over the Internet.​

Accepted Answer

This is sometimes referred to as "specific jurisdiction," and it allows a court to exercise jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant if that defendant purposefully directed their activities towards the state or its residents, and if the claim being brought against them arises out of or is related to those activities. The fact that the defendant conducted business online does not necessarily preclude this type of jurisdiction.

Question 5

Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never enough to support jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.​

Accepted Answer

Minimum contacts, although an important factor, are not the only factor considered in determining jurisdiction. In some cases, even minimal contacts may be sufficient to establish jurisdiction depending on the nature and circumstances of the case. The overall analysis of jurisdiction is a fact-specific inquiry that considers all relevant factors, including but not limited to, the defendant's contacts with the forum state, the nature of the claim, and the interest of the state in providing a forum for its residents to seek redress for their grievances.

Question 6

Small claims courts are inferior trial courts.​

Accepted Answer

Small claims courts are typically considered inferior trial courts because they have limited jurisdiction and only hear cases involving small amounts of money or property. Their procedures are also more informal and typically do not involve juries or attorneys.

Question 7

Trials courts conduct trials.​

Accepted Answer

Trials courts are the lower courts that conduct trials and make decisions based on the facts and evidence presented during the trial.

Question 8

A court can exercise jurisdiction over property located that is located within its boundaries.​

Accepted Answer

This is known as in rem jurisdiction, which means jurisdiction over the property itself rather than over a party.

Question 9

The role of the courts is to interpret and apply the laws.​

Accepted Answer

The primary role of the court system is to interpret and apply the laws, ensuring that justice is served and the rights of individuals or organizations are protected.

Question 10

To have standing to sue, a party must be "standing" in the geographical jurisdiction of the court in which a suit is filed.​

Accepted Answer

Standing refers to the legal right of a person or entity to bring a lawsuit or participate in a legal proceeding. It is determined by a variety of factors, including whether the party has suffered an injury or harm that is recognized by law and whether the court has jurisdiction over the matter. While geographical location may be a factor in determining jurisdiction, it is not the only consideration.

Question 11

Cases arising between citizens of different states involve diversity of citizenship.​

Accepted Answer

Cases involving citizens of different states are considered to involve diversity of citizenship.

Question 12

A justiciable controversy is a case in which the court's decision-the "justice" that will be served-will be controversial.​

Accepted Answer

A justiciable controversy refers to a dispute that is real and substantial, as opposed to hypothetical or abstract, and is appropriate for court review, not necessarily one where the decision will be controversial.

Question 13

A business firm may have to comply with the laws of any jurisdiction in which it actively targets customers.​

Accepted Answer

If a business actively targets customers in a particular jurisdiction, it may be subject to the laws and regulations of that jurisdiction, including those related to licensing, taxes, and consumer protection. This can include both physical and digital presence, such as having a store or website accessible in that jurisdiction. Failure to comply with these laws can result in legal and financial penalties.

Question 14

Concurrent jurisdiction exists when only state courts have the power to hear a particular case.​

Accepted Answer

Concurrent jurisdiction exists when both state and federal courts have the power to hear a particular case.

Question 15

For jurisdictional purposes, corporations are considered legal persons.​

Accepted Answer

This means that corporations can be sued, enter into contracts, and have legal rights and obligations in the same way individuals do.

Question 16

The minimum-contacts requirement is usually met if a corporation advertises or sells its products within a state.​

Accepted Answer

The minimum-contacts requirement can be met if a corporation advertises or sells its products within a state, among other factors such as having a physical presence or purposefully directing activities towards the state.

Question 17

States do not have exclusive jurisdiction on any matter.​

Accepted Answer

States have exclusive jurisdiction over certain matters, such as intrastate commerce and criminal law enforcement within their borders. However, there are also many areas where states share jurisdiction with the federal government, and the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over some matters, such as international relations and interstate commerce.

Question 18

State courts are superior to federal courts.​

Accepted Answer

Federal courts are superior to state courts when it comes to matters that fall under federal jurisdiction, such as cases involving federal laws, the Constitution, or disputes between citizens of different states. State courts handle a wide range of cases that fall under state law, but their authority is limited to the boundaries of their respective states. Federal courts, on the other hand, have jurisdiction over cases that cross state lines or involve federal interests. Therefore, federal courts are not only equal but also superior in certain situations.

Question 19

The term venue refers to the location of a trial.​

Accepted Answer

The term venue in legal terms refers to the location where a trial is held.

Question 20

In most states, in suits brought in small claims courts, lawyers are allowed.​

Accepted Answer

In most states, lawyers are allowed in small claims courts, although the procedures are simplified and designed to be navigable without legal representation.

Quiz 3: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

A state case typically originates in a federal court.​

The amount in controversy in a diversity of citizenship case must be more than $1 million before a federal court can take jurisdiction.​

The United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in any case.​

In many cases, a court can exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has done business in the state only over the Internet.​

Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never enough to support jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.​

Small claims courts are inferior trial courts.​

Trials courts conduct trials.​

A court can exercise jurisdiction over property located that is located within its boundaries.​

The role of the courts is to interpret and apply the laws.​

To have standing to sue, a party must be "standing" in the geographical jurisdiction of the court in which a suit is filed.​

Cases arising between citizens of different states involve diversity of citizenship.​

A justiciable controversy is a case in which the court's decision-the "justice" that will be served-will be controversial.​

A business firm may have to comply with the laws of any jurisdiction in which it actively targets customers.​

Concurrent jurisdiction exists when only state courts have the power to hear a particular case.​

For jurisdictional purposes, corporations are considered legal persons.​

The minimum-contacts requirement is usually met if a corporation advertises or sells its products within a state.​

States do not have exclusive jurisdiction on any matter.​

State courts are superior to federal courts.​

The term venue refers to the location of a trial.​

In most states, in suits brought in small claims courts, lawyers are allowed.​

A state case typically originates in a federal court.

The amount in controversy in a diversity of citizenship case must be more than $1 million before a federal court can take jurisdiction.

The United States Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction in any case.

In many cases, a court can exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant who has done business in the state only over the Internet.

Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never enough to support jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.

Small claims courts are inferior trial courts.

Trials courts conduct trials.

A court can exercise jurisdiction over property located that is located within its boundaries.

The role of the courts is to interpret and apply the laws.

To have standing to sue, a party must be "standing" in the geographical jurisdiction of the court in which a suit is filed.

Cases arising between citizens of different states involve diversity of citizenship.

A justiciable controversy is a case in which the court's decision-the "justice" that will be served-will be controversial.

A business firm may have to comply with the laws of any jurisdiction in which it actively targets customers.

Concurrent jurisdiction exists when only state courts have the power to hear a particular case.

For jurisdictional purposes, corporations are considered legal persons.

The minimum-contacts requirement is usually met if a corporation advertises or sells its products within a state.

States do not have exclusive jurisdiction on any matter.

State courts are superior to federal courts.

The term venue refers to the location of a trial.

In most states, in suits brought in small claims courts, lawyers are allowed.