Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Philosophy
Study Set
Introduction to Formal Logic with Philosophical Applications
Quiz 4: Monadic Predicate Logic
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 281
Essay
construct theories for which the following interpretation is a model (i.e. construct at least two sentences which are true under the given interpretation). Domain = {1, 2, 3, ..., 28, 29, 30} E = {2, 4, 6, ..., 28, 30} O = {1, 3, 5, ..., 27, 29} P = (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29} a = 1 d = 19 b = 2 e = 23 c = 3 f = 29 -Construct a theory of at least three sentences which uses all three predicates and at least three different constants.
Question 282
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∀x)(Hx ⊃ ∼Ix) 2. (∀x)(Ix ⊃ Ux) / (∀x)(Hx ⊃ ∼Ux)
Question 283
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∀x)[Tx ⊃ (∼Wx
∨
\lor
∨
Fx)] 2. (∀x)[(∼Wx • Tx) ⊃ ∼Fx] 3. (∃x)(Tx • Fx) / (∃x)(Tx • ∼Wx)
Question 284
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∀x)(Kx
∨
\lor
∨
Lx) 2. (∃x)∼Kx / (∀x)Lx
Question 285
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∀x)(Mx ⊃ Nx) 2. (∃x)(Mx • Ox) 3. Oa / Oa • Na
Question 286
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∃x)(Gx • Hx) 2. (∃x)(Gx • Jx) 3. (∀x)(Jx ⊃ Kx) / (∃x)(Hx • Jx)
Question 287
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∀x)(Kx ⊃ ∼Lx) 2. (∃x)(Mx • Lx) / (∀x)(Kx ⊃ ∼Mx)
Question 288
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∃x)(∼Ax ≡ Cx) 2. (∃x)(Ax • Cx) 3. (∀x)(Bx ⊃ Ax) / (∀x)(Cx ⊃ Bx)
Question 289
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∃x)(Mx • Nx) 2. (∀x)(Ox ⊃ Mx) / (∀x)(Ox ⊃ Nx)
Question 290
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∃x)(Hx • Ix) 2. (∃x)(Hx • ∼Ix) 3. (∀x)(Jx ⊃ Ix) / (∀x)(Jx ⊃ Hx)
Question 291
Essay
provide a conterexample in a finite domain to each given invalid argument. -1. (∃x)Sx 2. (∀x)[Sx ⊃ (Tx ⊃ ∼Ux)] 3. Ua • Ub 4. (∃x)∼Ux / (∃x)(Sx • ∼Tx)
Question 292
Essay
determine whether the given argument is valid or invalid. If it is valid, provide a derivation of the conclusion from the premises. If it is invalid, provide a counterexample. -1. (∀x)(Fx ⊃ Gx) 2. (∃x)Fx / (∀x)(∼Gx ⊃ ∼Ex)
Question 293
Essay
determine whether the given argument is valid or invalid. If it is valid, provide a derivation of the conclusion from the premises. If it is invalid, provide a counterexample. -1. (∀x)(Ax ⊃ Bx) 2. (∃x)(Ax • Cx) / ∼(∀x)(Bx ⊃ ∼Cx)
Question 294
Essay
determine whether the given argument is valid or invalid. If it is valid, provide a derivation of the conclusion from the premises. If it is invalid, provide a counterexample. -1. (∃x)[(Ax • Bx) • Cx] 2. (∀x)[(Ax • ∼Cx) ⊃ ∼Bx] / (∃x)(Ax • ∼Bx)
Question 295
Essay
determine whether the given argument is valid or invalid. If it is valid, provide a derivation of the conclusion from the premises. If it is invalid, provide a counterexample. -1. (∃x)[(Dx • Ex) • Fx] 2. (∀x)[(Dx • Fx) ⊃ ∼Gx] / (∃x)(Ex • ∼Gx)