Question 1

Evaluation of program outcomes ensures that the organisational mission is adhered to and that programmes are delivered in their intended manner, at the intended time and with the intended participants.

Accepted Answer

Evaluation of program outcomes is a critical element of ensuring that programmes are meeting their objectives and adhering to the organisational mission. It helps to identify areas for improvement and makes sure that resources are being used effectively. Therefore, it is true that evaluation of program outcomes ensures the organisational mission is adhered to and programs are delivered in their intended manner, at the intended time and with the intended participants.

Question 2

Discuss why certain evaluation tools and approaches are more suited to particular SD and SFD contexts than others.

Accepted Answer

Evaluation tools and approaches are not one-size-fits-all; they need to be tailored to the specific context of sustainable development (SD) and sustainable food development (SFD) projects. This is because different projects have different goals, stakeholders, and environmental, social, and economic impacts.

For example, in an SD project focused on water conservation in a rural community, a participatory approach to evaluation may be more suited. This is because involving the community in the evaluation process can provide valuable insights into the project's effectiveness and sustainability. On the other hand, in an SFD project aimed at improving food security in an urban setting, a quantitative approach to evaluation may be more appropriate. This is because it can provide concrete data on changes in food access and nutrition.

Similarly, certain evaluation tools may be better suited to specific SD and SFD contexts. For instance, in a project focused on sustainable agriculture, using a life cycle assessment tool can help to measure the environmental impacts of different farming practices. On the other hand, in a project aimed at promoting sustainable fisheries, a fisheries assessment tool may be more relevant for evaluating the health of fish stocks and the impact of fishing practices.

In summary, the choice of evaluation tools and approaches should be guided by the specific goals, stakeholders, and impacts of the SD and SFD projects. By selecting the most appropriate tools and approaches, project managers can ensure that the evaluation process is meaningful, relevant, and ultimately contributes to the success and sustainability of the project.

Question 3

A holistic evaluation process should be both formative and:

Accepted Answer

A holistic evaluation process should not only provide ongoing feedback (formative) but also assess the overall outcome or effectiveness (summative) of the program, project or initiative. The other options (intuitive, comprehensive, cumulative) are not inaccurate but do not address the need for a summative aspect in a holistic evaluation process.

Question 4

Coalter (2013) highlights three specific outputs in his discussion of programme theory. Which one does NOT feature in his discussion?

Accepted Answer

Coalter's discussion of programme theory highlights three specific outputs: the nature of the programme, social relationships, and social climate. Cultural knowledge is not mentioned as an output.

Question 5

Which element does NOT feature in Coalters (2013) discussion of Programme Theory

Accepted Answer

Coalters (2013) discusses Programme Theory in terms of inputs, outputs, and outcomes, but does not specifically mention "consequences" as a component of Programme Theory.

Question 6

By analysing why a program was successful or not, managers can learn lessons about:

Accepted Answer

By analysing why a program was successful or not, managers can learn lessons about the context in which the program was implemented, the approach taken, the tools used, and the intent of the program. Therefore, all of the choices are correct.

Question 7

For sport for development programs to be effective - and not just another arm of global hegemony - design must begin in situ and with a proper assessment of the local understandings of desired outcomes.

Accepted Answer

The statement suggests that effective sport for development programs must be designed locally and consider the local community's understanding of desired outcomes, rather than imposing Western ideals on a community. Therefore, the statement is true.

Question 8

Program theory offers a framework through which to understand the relationship between program design and program objectives.

Accepted Answer

The answer of Program theory offers a framework through which...

Question 9

In a sporting context, competition for funding is generally high and funded organisations are required to prove that they have directed and used funds appropriately.

Accepted Answer

In a sporting context, organizations are required to compete for funding and demonstrate how they have used it appropriately.

Question 10

Monitoring and evaluation ensures that resources and funding are steadily increased.

Accepted Answer

Monitoring and evaluation is not primarily focused on increasing resources and funding, but rather on assessing the effectiveness and impact of interventions and programs. While successful monitoring and evaluation may ultimately contribute to securing additional resources and funding, this is not its primary purpose.

Question 11

Strategically, managers of SD and SFD programs must identify the specific outcomes they desire from the program, and simultaneously consider how they will measure the success of those outcomes.

Accepted Answer

This statement is true. Managers of sustainable development (SD) and sustainable forest development (SFD) programs need to have a clear understanding of the outcomes they want to achieve and how to measure them in order to assess the success of their programs.

Question 12

Discuss why quantitative methods are best suited to measurement of change.

Accepted Answer

The answer of Discuss why quantitative methods are best suited...

Quiz 11: Evaluating Sport Development Emma Sherry, Nico Schulenkorf, Pamm Phillips