Question 1

Define each of the following and briefly explain why it is relevant to the study of political parties.
-Party networks.

Accepted Answer

The answer of Define each of the following and briefly...

Question 2

Define each of the following and briefly explain why it is relevant to the study of political parties.
-"Service parties."

Accepted Answer

The answer of Define each of the following and briefly...

Question 3

Define each of the following and briefly explain why it is relevant to the study of political parties.
-The Democrats' "50-state strategy."

Accepted Answer

The answer of Define each of the following and briefly...

Question 4

How does the increasing activity of the two parties' national committees affect the activities of the various state parties? Does this increased national party activity strengthen or weaken the state party organizations?

Accepted Answer

The answer of How does the increasing activity of the...

Question 5

How does the increasing activity of the two parties' national committees affect the workings of Congress? Has it led to greater polarization in the U.S. House and Senate? How do these more powerful national committees relate to the president of the U.S.?

Accepted Answer

The answer of How does the increasing activity of the...

Question 6

If someone told you that changes in national politics in recent decades have led to the development of a centralized party system in the U.S., what evidence would you present to respond to their contention? (Hint: is federalism involved?)

Accepted Answer

The answer of If someone told you that changes in...

Question 7

In what ways does a stronger national party organization lead to benefits for a democratic society, and in what ways does a stronger national party disadvantage a democracy?

Accepted Answer

The answer of In what ways does a stronger national...

Question 8

What led the two national parties to become "service parties"? Did both parties follow the same path in becoming service parties, or did they follow different paths? How has this change affected the parties' behavior today?

Accepted Answer

The answer of What led the two national parties to...

Question 9

If you were chair of one of the major parties' Hill committees, what are the arguments that your trying to intervene in a local primary election for a U.S. House seat would help the party locally and nationally, and what are the arguments that such intervention would hurt the party?

Accepted Answer

The answer of If you were chair of one of...

Quiz 4: The Parties National Organizations

Define each of the following and briefly explain why it is relevant to the study of political parties. -Party networks.

Define each of the following and briefly explain why it is relevant to the study of political parties. -"Service parties."

Define each of the following and briefly explain why it is relevant to the study of political parties. -The Democrats' "50-state strategy."

How does the increasing activity of the two parties' national committees affect the activities of the various state parties? Does this increased national party activity strengthen or weaken the state party organizations?

How does the increasing activity of the two parties' national committees affect the workings of Congress? Has it led to greater polarization in the U.S. House and Senate? How do these more powerful national committees relate to the president of the U.S.?

If someone told you that changes in national politics in recent decades have led to the development of a centralized party system in the U.S., what evidence would you present to respond to their contention? (Hint: is federalism involved?)

In what ways does a stronger national party organization lead to benefits for a democratic society, and in what ways does a stronger national party disadvantage a democracy?

What led the two national parties to become "service parties"? Did both parties follow the same path in becoming service parties, or did they follow different paths? How has this change affected the parties' behavior today?

If you were chair of one of the major parties' Hill committees, what are the arguments that your trying to intervene in a local primary election for a U.S. House seat would help the party locally and nationally, and what are the arguments that such intervention would hurt the party?