Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Political Science
Study Set
Constitutional and Administrative Law
Quiz 16: Parliamentary Privilege
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 1
True/False
New privileges can only be created by statute.
Question 2
Multiple Choice
Which of the following is NOT a power of the Commons in relation to contempt of Parliament?
Question 3
Multiple Choice
Which of these are the three circumstances laid down in the case of Pepper v Hart (1993) under which courts will be allowed to refer to parliamentary debates?
Question 4
Multiple Choice
Which of the following are identified as Erskine May examples of contempt of Parliament?
Question 5
Multiple Choice
Which of the following need to be registered in the Register of Members' Interests?
Question 6
Essay
Explain the source and nature of parliamentary privileges.
Question 7
Essay
Evaluate the relationship between the courts and privilege.
Question 8
Essay
Analyse, with reference to key cases, the nature of the privilege of freedom of speech.
Question 9
Essay
With reference to examples, to what extent do you believe that the operation of the privilege of freedom of speech is effective and necessary in order to allow Parliament to hold the Executive to account.
Question 10
Essay
Describe with reference to case law, the manner and extent to which Parliament can regulate its own proceedings.
Question 11
Multiple Choice
In relation to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, which of the following is FALSE?
Question 12
Multiple Choice
Which of the following is TRUE in relation to the privilege of freedom of speech?
Question 13
Multiple Choice
Which of the following would not attract ABSOLUTE privilege in relation to freedom of speech?
Question 14
True/False
The privilege of freedom from arrest only applies to criminal matters.
Question 15
True/False
The privilege of freedom of speech attaches to the criminal activities of MPs.
Question 16
True/False
In the case of A v United Kingdom (2002) the defendant was successful in arguing that her inability to challenge defamatory remarks made about her in Parliament infringed upon her rights under articles 6, 8 and 13 of the ECHR.