In United States v. Mead Corporation, where Mead sued Customs when it changed the classification of the planners Mead imported which resulted in Mead having to pay a 4% tariff, the Supreme Court held that:
A) the case should be reevaluated in the Court of Appeals using the Skidmore standard
B) the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence
C) all rulings by Customs are equivalent to federal law so Mead had no case
D) Mead should pay a 2% tariff as a compromise
E) the change in classification was unjustified so Mead did not owe any tariffs
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q201: If an anti-dumping order is issued against
Q202: "Dumping" is the practice of:
A) importing goods
Q203: To respond to claims of dumping in
Q204: In United States v. Mead Corporation, where
Q205: Gables purchased used Mercedes from a German
Q207: Gables purchased used Mercedes from a German
Q208: RoundTire Bicycle manufactures bicycles. It buys parts
Q209: The U.S. bans a number of products
Q210: To respond to claims of dumping in
Q211: Which of the following items are banned
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents