Solved

In United States V

Question 206

Multiple Choice

In United States v. Mead Corporation, where Mead sued Customs when it changed the classification of the planners Mead imported which resulted in Mead having to pay a 4% tariff, the Supreme Court held that:


A) the case should be reevaluated in the Court of Appeals using the Skidmore standard
B) the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence
C) all rulings by Customs are equivalent to federal law so Mead had no case
D) Mead should pay a 2% tariff as a compromise
E) the change in classification was unjustified so Mead did not owe any tariffs

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents