Arguments for state regulation of insurance, as opposed to federal regulation, include all but one of the following:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

State regulation of insurance is argued to offer greater flexibility, satisfactory efficiency, avoidance of dual regulatory systems, and less federal control. However, it does not inherently provide greater uniformity; this is more characteristic of federal regulation, which applies the same standards across all states.

Arguments for State Regulation of Insurance, as Opposed to Federal