In Reget v.City of La Crosse case,where a business owner claims he was selected by the City for bad treatment,the appeals court held that the summary judgment against Reget was correct because:
A) Reget failed to obtain the proper paperwork for his suit
B) Reget failed to show that his property had been illegally searched
C) Reget failed to show that he had been intentionally treated differently than others similarly situated
D) Reget showed that he had been intentionally treated differently than others similarly situated
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q261: In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City
Q266: In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City
Q267: In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City
Q381: In addition to its restriction on "cruel
Q383: Protection from excessive fines comes from:
A) the
Q385: The right to trial is guaranteed in
Q395: When state action either shocks the conscience
Q398: The government seized a large amount of
Q399: When the state infringes on fundamental liberty
Q417: When governments restrict the rights of citizens,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents