Question 1

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court held that:

Accepted Answer

The answer of In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City...

Question 2

In Reget v.City of La Crosse case,where a business owner claims he was selected by the City for bad treatment,the appeals court held that the summary judgment against Reget was correct because:

Accepted Answer

The appeals court stated that the summary judgment against Reget was correct because he failed to show that he had been intentionally treated differently from others who were similarly situated. This means that Reget did not provide enough evidence to support his claim of being selected for bad treatment by the City. Options A, B, D, and E are all incorrect as they are not mentioned in the case summary or reasoning behind the decision.

Question 3

When the state infringes on fundamental liberty interests without narrowly tailoring that infringement to serve a compelling state interest it is violating:

Accepted Answer

The correct legal principle is "strict scrutiny," which requires the government to prove that any infringement on fundamental liberties is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. None of the options provided (fair process, fair game, fair play, due law) accurately describe this principle.

Question 4

When governments restrict the rights of citizens,unless a fundamental constitutional liberty is at stake,the law needs to relate rationally to ______________to satisfy due process requirements.

Accepted Answer

The law needs to have a rational relationship to a legitimate government interest in order to satisfy due process requirements. This means that the government's reason for restricting citizen's rights must be reasonable and necessary for the wellbeing of society as a whole. Private interests, monetary interests, and moral interests are not enough to justify restrictions on constitutional rights.

Question 5

When state action either shocks the conscience or offends judicial notions of fairness and human dignity it is violating:

Accepted Answer

The answer of When state action either shocks the conscience...

Question 6

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court applied a two-step approach to determine if due process had been violated.The two steps are:

Accepted Answer

The answer of In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City...

Question 7

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court held that:

Accepted Answer

The appeals court held that since the City did not have a cause or hearing for not renewing Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license, there had been a violation of due process. Therefore, choice A is the correct answer.

Question 8

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court applied a two-step approach to determine if due process had been violated.The two steps are:

Accepted Answer

The two-step approach applied by the appeals court in Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v. City of Country Club Hills requires asking whether the plaintiff has been deprived of a protected liberty or property interest and whether the deprivation occurred without due process. This approach is consistent with the requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Therefore, the correct answer is A.

Question 9

When state action either shocks the conscience or offends judicial notions of fairness and human dignity it is violating:

Accepted Answer

The term "due process" refers to the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process is violated when state action is arbitrary, oppressive, or unjustified. When state action shocks the conscience or offends judicial notions of fairness and human dignity, it is violating due process.

Question 10

Suppose the Texas legislature ruled that all motorcycle drivers and passengers under the age of 21 had to wear helmets.This could be attacked by a young motorcycle driver who did not want to wear a helmet as a violation of:

Accepted Answer

The answer of Suppose the Texas legislature ruled that all...

Question 11

The strongest claims of violations of protection involve discrimination based on:

Accepted Answer

The strongest claims of violations of protection often involve discrimination based on race or sex, as these are historically and legally recognized categories that have been subject to significant discrimination and are protected under various civil rights laws.

Question 12

A law must relate rationally to a legitimate government interest to:

Accepted Answer

The answer of A law must relate rationally to a...

Question 13

A law must relate rationally to a legitimate government interest to:

Accepted Answer

The rational basis test is a level of judicial review used to evaluate the validity of a challenged law or policy. Under this test, a law must be rationally related to a legitimate government interest in order to satisfy the requirements of due process. The other choices do not pertain to the rational basis test.

Question 14

Which of the following would be likely to be a violation of the equal protection clause:

Accepted Answer

Denying women the opportunity to enroll in a college solely based on their gender would be a violation of the equal protection clause.

Question 15

Equal protection:

Accepted Answer

Equal protection does not extend to all government activities. Certain government actions, such as those related to national security or immigration, may be subject to different standards of review under equal protection analysis.

Question 16

When the state infringes on fundamental liberty interests without narrowly tailoring that infringement to serve a compelling state interest it is violating:

Accepted Answer

Due process is a principle that requires the government to respect all the legal rights owed to a person. When the state infringes on fundamental liberty interests without narrowly tailoring that infringement to serve a compelling state interest, it violates the due process principle. This violation occurs because the government has not provided a fair and impartial process to the person whose liberty interests are being infringed upon.

Question 17

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court held that:

Accepted Answer

The appeals court held that a liquor license, once granted in Illinois, is a form of property protected by the due process clause. Therefore, the City of Country Club Hills had to provide Pro's Sports Bar & Grill with notice and an opportunity to be heard before revoking or refusing to renew their license.

Question 18

A law that took a protected freedom away from women without a compelling state interest would be unconstitutional because it:

Accepted Answer

A law that takes away a protected freedom from women without a compelling state interest would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, which states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. It would be unjust to treat women differently from men without a convincing reason for doing so. The other options are not relevant in this case.

Question 19

Which of the following is likely to violate the due process clause:

Accepted Answer

Laws that shock the conscience of a court and laws that infringe on fundamental liberty interests are likely to violate the due process clause. Laws that do not treat people equally may violate equal protection, which is a separate clause. Therefore, the best choice is option D which includes both options B and C. Option A is not a likely violation of the due process clause.

Question 20

A law that creates a class that suffers a loss of freedom:

Accepted Answer

Any law that creates a class that suffers a loss of freedom is unconstitutional as it would likely violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The government cannot discriminate against a particular class of people and treat them differently from others without a compelling reason.

Quiz 4: The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court held that:

In Reget v.City of La Crosse case,where a business owner claims he was selected by the City for bad treatment,the appeals court held that the summary judgment against Reget was correct because:

When the state infringes on fundamental liberty interests without narrowly tailoring that infringement to serve a compelling state interest it is violating:

When governments restrict the rights of citizens,unless a fundamental constitutional liberty is at stake,the law needs to relate rationally to ______________to satisfy due process requirements.

When state action either shocks the conscience or offends judicial notions of fairness and human dignity it is violating:

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court applied a two-step approach to determine if due process had been violated.The two steps are:

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court held that:

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court applied a two-step approach to determine if due process had been violated.The two steps are:

When state action either shocks the conscience or offends judicial notions of fairness and human dignity it is violating:

Suppose the Texas legislature ruled that all motorcycle drivers and passengers under the age of 21 had to wear helmets.This could be attacked by a young motorcycle driver who did not want to wear a helmet as a violation of:

The strongest claims of violations of protection involve discrimination based on:

A law must relate rationally to a legitimate government interest to:

A law must relate rationally to a legitimate government interest to:

Which of the following would be likely to be a violation of the equal protection clause:

Equal protection:

When the state infringes on fundamental liberty interests without narrowly tailoring that infringement to serve a compelling state interest it is violating:

In Pro's Sports Bar & Grill v.City of Country Club Hills in which the City of Country Club Hills did not renew Pro's Sports Bar & Grill's liquor license,the appeals court held that:

A law that took a protected freedom away from women without a compelling state interest would be unconstitutional because it:

Which of the following is likely to violate the due process clause:

A law that creates a class that suffers a loss of freedom: