Question 1

A person may use which of the following as a defense to the tort of trespass on land:

Accepted Answer

The answer of A person may use which of the...

Question 2

An unauthorized intrusion by a person or a thing on land belonging to another is:

Accepted Answer

The tort of trespass to land refers to an unauthorized intrusion by a person or a thing on land belonging to another. It is illegal in all states and can result in the owner of the land seeking damages or an injunction to prevent future trespass. Easements are authorized intrusions on someone else's land, and battery and trespass to personal property involve different types of intrusion.

Question 3

Which of the following is not true with respect to trespass to land?

Accepted Answer

All the statements A through D correctly describe aspects of trespass to land or exceptions to it. Unauthorized intrusion (A), the right to peaceful enjoyment (B), and the requirement that the landowner must not have authorized the entry (C) are all elements that define trespass to land. Statement D correctly notes an exception to trespass: airplanes flying over land at a reasonable altitude do not constitute trespassing, as established by aviation laws and regulations.

Question 4

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that:

Accepted Answer

The answer of In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting...

Question 5

In a tort action for trespass to land the:

Accepted Answer

In a tort action for trespass to land, the intruder is not excused even if they were mistaken about the right to enter the land. As long as the intruder intentionally entered or remained on the land without permission of the owner, they can be held liable for trespass. The property owner does not need to demonstrate actual injury, and there is no requirement for the land to be fenced or posted.

Question 6

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that Kulig was not liable because:

Accepted Answer

The courts held that Smith was a trespasser on the premises, despite the fact that he was visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig. As a trespasser, Smith was not owed a duty of care by Kulig, and therefore Kulig was not liable for his injuries or death.

Question 7

An activity that substantially and unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of someone's land is a(n):

Accepted Answer

A private nuisance is an activity that substantially and unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of someone's land. Conversion involves someone taking or using someone else's property without permission or legal right. Final nuisance and unreasonable nuisance are not commonly used legal terms. Property nuisance is not a specific legal term.

Question 8

A person may use which of the following as a defense to the tort of trespass on land:

Accepted Answer

Protection of property from damage is a valid defense for the tort of trespass on land. Ignorance, stupidity, lack of awareness, and possessing a state hunting license are not valid defenses.

Question 9

Which of the following is not true with respect to trespass to land?

Accepted Answer

The statement that "the land owner must demonstrate physical injury to the land" is not true. Trespass to land occurs simply by the unauthorized intrusion onto someone else's land, regardless of whether or not there is physical damage.

Question 10

The law of torts recognizes two kinds of nuisances,these are:

Accepted Answer

The law of torts recognizes two kinds of nuisances: public and private. The options provided do not accurately represent these categories, making "none of the other choices" the correct answer.

Question 11

In a tort action for trespass to land the:

Accepted Answer

Trespass to land does not require the property owner to demonstrate actual injury, nor does it matter if the land was fenced or if the trespasser thought they had a right to be on the land. The essence of trespass is the unauthorized entry onto land that belongs to another, regardless of intent or knowledge.

Question 12

Private and public nuisances are:

Accepted Answer

The answer of Private and public nuisances are:
...

Question 13

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that:

Accepted Answer

The answer of In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting...

Question 14

A _____________ is an activity that substantially and unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of someone's land.

Accepted Answer

Private nuisance is an activity that unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of someone's land. Conversion refers to the wrongful taking or use of someone else's property, and final nuisance or unreasonable nuisance are not legal terms. Property nuisance is not a commonly used term and does not specifically refer to interference with land use and enjoyment.

Question 15

A person may use which of the following as a defense to the tort of trespass on land:

Accepted Answer

A person may use the defense of helping someone in danger as a justification for trespassing on land in order to save a life. However, this defense is limited to situations where it was necessary for the person to enter the land to prevent harm or save a life, and they acted in a reasonable and responsible manner. The other options, such as ignorance or lack of awareness, would not typically serve as a defense to the tort of trespass. A state hunting license may allow someone to hunt on private land, but it would not necessarily justify trespassing on the land for any other purpose. Stupidity is not a recognized legal defense.

Question 16

An unauthorized intrusion by a person or a thing on land belonging to another is:

Accepted Answer

An unauthorized intrusion by a person or a thing on land belonging to another is typically considered trespass, which is not listed among the options provided. Therefore, none of the other choices are correct.

Question 17

The law of torts recognizes two kinds of nuisances,these are:

Accepted Answer

The law of torts recognizes two kinds of nuisances - public and private. Public nuisance is the interference of a right that is common to the general public while private nuisance is a substantial and unreasonable interference with another person’s use or enjoyment of their property.

Question 18

Private and public nuisances are:

Accepted Answer

Private and public nuisances are the two kinds of nuisances recognized by the law of torts. Private nuisance refers to an interference with the use and enjoyment of one's property, while public nuisance refers to a nuisance that affects the public at large.

Question 19

If there is a dangerous condition on a property,the landowner:

Accepted Answer

Landowners generally have no duty to warn trespassers of dangers on their property. The primary obligation is towards those who are on the property legally, such as invitees and licensees.

Question 20

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that:

Accepted Answer

The answer of In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting...

Quiz 8: Real and Personal Property

A person may use which of the following as a defense to the tort of trespass on land:

An unauthorized intrusion by a person or a thing on land belonging to another is:

Which of the following is not true with respect to trespass to land?

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that:

In a tort action for trespass to land the:

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that Kulig was not liable because:

An activity that substantially and unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of someone's land is a(n) :

A person may use which of the following as a defense to the tort of trespass on land:

Which of the following is not true with respect to trespass to land?

The law of torts recognizes two kinds of nuisances,these are:

In a tort action for trespass to land the:

Private and public nuisances are:

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that:

A _____________ is an activity that substantially and unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of someone's land.

A person may use which of the following as a defense to the tort of trespass on land:

An unauthorized intrusion by a person or a thing on land belonging to another is:

The law of torts recognizes two kinds of nuisances,these are:

Private and public nuisances are:

If there is a dangerous condition on a property,the landowner:

In Smith v.Kulig,Smith was killed when visiting his friend who rented an apartment from Kulig,when the fire escape at the back of the building collapsed under Smith,the courts held that: