In Treibacher Industrie v.Allegheny Technologies,involving a dispute over the sale of powered metal from Treibacher of Austria to Allegheny of the U.S. ,Allegheny suddenly cancelled its order,forcing Treibacher to suffer a loss.It sued under the CISG.The appeals court held that the matter would be resolved under the UCC because that was the relevant law to this transaction.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The question states that the dispute involved the sale of powered metal from Treibacher of Austria to Allegheny of the U.S., and that Treibacher sued under the CISG. Therefore, it is more likely that the matter would be resolved under the CISG, which is the relevant law to international sales contracts, rather than the UCC, which is the relevant law to domestic sales contracts in the U.S.

In Treibacher Industrie V