In Callison V

In Callison v.City of Philadelphia,where Callison was told that while on FMLA leave that he had to be at home during work hour unless he called to report where he would be going,he sued to protest the policy.The court of appeals held that:

A) even though there is nothing in the FMLA that prevents employers from ensuring that employees on leave do not abuse their leave,the City's call-in policy did violated Callison's FMLA rights
B) since there is nothing in the FMLA that prevents employers from ensuring that employees on leave do not abuse their leave,the City's call-in policy did not violate any of Callison's FMLA rights
C) the FMLA does not allow employers to check on employees who are on sick leave so the City's call-in policy was illegal
D) the City's call-in policy was a requirement of the FMLA and Callison should be fined for violating it
E) the City's call-in policy was legal,but suspending Callison for violating it was not