In Spanish Broadcasting V

In Spanish Broadcasting v.Clear Channel,where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish-language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting,a large Spanish-language radio chain,the court held that the:

A) case failed because Spanish could not show evidence of anticompetitive conduct
B) two companies acted "in concert" to try to damage Spanish's market position,thereby violating the Sherman Act
C) two companies controlled a dominant share of the market and used their power to reduce the ability of Spanish to obtain sponsors,thereby violating the Sherman Act
D) relationship was monopolization and Clear had to sell its interest in Hispanic
E) none of the other choices