In Spanish Broadcasting V

In Spanish Broadcasting v.Clear Channel,where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish-language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting,a large Spanish-language radio chain,the court held that the:

A) SB did had a case because they could show that CC and HBC's conduct had an anticompetitive effect on the entire market
B) SB did not have a case because they could not show that CC and HBC's conduct had an anticompetitive effect on the entire market
C) CC and HBC were in violation of the Clayton Act and must face criminal charges
D) CC and HBC were not in violation of any antitrust law,but they were still liable for damages due to their unreasonable conduct towards SB
E) CC and HBC were liable for damages treble damages due to their unreasonable conduct towards SB