In Weyerhaeuser v.Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber the Supreme Court held that
Weyerhaeuser was outbidding its competitors to buy raw timber because it was highly efficient in production,so it did not violate the Robinson-Patman Act.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court in Weyerhaeuser v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber did not address the Robinson-Patman Act, which deals with price discrimination. Instead, the case focused on predatory bidding under antitrust laws, specifically whether Weyerhaeuser's actions constituted an antitrust violation by driving competitors out of business through overbidding for raw materials.

In Weyerhaeuser V