The Arias v.Dyncorp case involved a question of:
A) Whether Dyncorp was required to notify Ecuadorians of the chemical spraying in advance.
B) Whether the indiscriminate spraying of chemicals violates international law.
C) Whether the country of Ecuador had a claim against a U.S. corporation.
D) Whether the plaintiffs' claims pursuant to the Alien Tort Claims Act should be dismissed.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Under NAFTA's Environmental Side Agreements:
A) Mexican environmental
Q24: There is no U.S.law forbidding the export
Q25: Before a U.S.firm can export chemical substances
Q26: Developing nations generally favor
A) Creation of a
Q26: The "circle of poison" refers to the
Q27: Dynatec,Inc.(a U.S.corporation based in New York)engages in
Q28: In the Shrimp Importation Case,the WTO Appellate
Q31: In the area of solving international environmental
Q33: Because of the lack of international agreement
Q33: The most important aspect of the Basel
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents