Dynatec,Inc.(a U.S.corporation based in New York) engages in oil drilling in Colombia.Indigenous Indian tribes finds that certain rivers and streams have become polluted as a result and that hunting and fishing are adversely affected.A U.S.lawyer brings a lawsuit on behalf of the tribe in federal district court in New York.Dynatec wants the action dismissed,or at least not heard by the federal court in New York.The best bet for the case not to be heard in the federal court in New York would be for the Dynatec lawyer to:
A) Move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
B) Move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
C) Move for a stay pending arbitration.
D) Move for dismissal based on forum non conveniens.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Under NAFTA's Environmental Side Agreements:
A) Mexican environmental
Q23: The U.S.prohibits the export of pesticides not
Q24: There is no U.S.law forbidding the export
Q25: Before a U.S.firm can export chemical substances
Q26: Developing nations generally favor
A) Creation of a
Q28: In the Shrimp Importation Case,the WTO Appellate
Q29: The Arias v.Dyncorp case involved a question
Q31: In the area of solving international environmental
Q33: Because of the lack of international agreement
Q40: Developing nations tend to oppose extensive international
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents