Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its waste "for free" by dumping it into a nearby river. While the firm benefits from dumping waste into the river, the waste reduces fish and bird reproduction. This causes damage to local fishermen and bird watchers. At a cost, Erie Textiles can filter out the toxins, in which case local fishermen and bird watchers will not suffer any damage. The relevant gains and losses (in thousands of dollars) for the three parties are listed below. If all three parties can communicate and negotiate with each other at no cost, will Erie Textiles use a filter?
A) No, because it makes $200 less in profit with the filter.
B) Yes, because the benefit it would receive from being able to advertise that it acts in an environmentally responsible way exceeds the cost of using a filter.
C) No, because use of a filter would result in smaller total economic surplus.
D) Yes, because fishermen and bird watchers are willing to pay enough to Erie Textiles to offset the cost of using a filter.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q55: Suppose there are ten people playing cards
Q56: Suppose that your neighbor smokes in his
Q57: Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its
Q58: Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its
Q59: Curly and Moe are considering living alone
Q61: In order to achieve the socially optimal
Q62: A policy maker has argued for higher
Q63: This graph shows the marginal cost and
Q64: Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its
Q65: This graph shows the marginal cost and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents