The argument behind the Peter Principle is that individuals who are good performers in one job will probably be good performers in the next job up the promotion ladder.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument behind the Peter Principle is actually the opposite. It suggests that individuals who are good performers in one job will be promoted to the next job, but may not necessarily be good performers in that new role. This is because the skills required for the new role may be different or more complex than those required for the previous role. As a result, individuals may be promoted beyond their level of competency, leading to a decline in performance and productivity.

The Argument Behind the Peter Principle Is That Individuals Who