In Estate of Weingeroff v.Pilatus Aircraft,the plaintiff's representative brought a diversity action against Pilatus,a Swiss company that manufactured the plane that crashed killing Weingeroff.The court decided that:
A) because Pilatus was a Swiss company they are immune from civil law suits.
B) Pilatus wins because the $1M+ that they spent in Pennsylvania was too insignificant to create minimum contacts and no specific marketing was done targeted to Pennsylvania.
C) Weingeroff wins because spending over $1M in Pennsylvania satisfied the minimum contacts requirement to create jurisdiction.
D) Weingeroff wins because Pilatus conducted a nationwide marketing campaign and specifically manufactured planes to meet FAA compliance constituting purposeful availment
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: In Mink v.AAAA Development LLC,the court refused
Q53: The principal federal trial court is the:
A)
Q54: Rich has been arrested for a series
Q55: The exchange of e-mail between companies in
Q56: When a party files a writ of
Q58: The "effects test" is utilized:
A) to determine
Q59: Olivetone,Inc.,a Florida corporation manufactures and sells sun
Q60: An Oregon Corporation and a New Hampshire
Q61: Which of the following will not create
Q72: In Keeton v.Hustler Magazine,the New Hampshire court
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents