What was the reason for the decision in the case of De Lassalle v Guildford [1901] 2 KB 215?
A) The oral statement was representational rather than promissory.
B) The oral statement was inconsistent with the terms of the written document.
C) The oral statement was intended to form part of the agreement between the parties.
D) The oral statement was promissory and therefore enforceable as a collateral contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: When is a particular statement more likely
Q3: In the case of an oral contract,
Q6: What was the reason for the decision
Q7: If one of the parties had a
Q8: In the case of a written contract,the
Q12: Which of the following statements is the
Q13: Which of the following statements is incorrect?
A)The
Q14: If a collateral contract is inconsistent with
Q19: Which of the following statements is the
Q20: Explain how the courts decide between a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents