The primary argument against reductionism is that
A)using multiple levels of analysis makes understanding needlessly complex.
B)certain phenomena may only emerge at specific levels of analysis.
C)it is impossible to identify the best level of analysis for some phenomena.
D)theoretical biases make it difficult to adjust levels of analysis.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The primary argument against reductionism is that certain phenomena may only emerge at specific levels of analysis. Reductionism assumes that complex phenomena can be best understood by breaking them down into simpler parts or levels of analysis, but this approach may miss important emergent properties that arise from the interaction of these parts. Therefore, it is argued that a holistic approach that considers multiple levels of analysis may be necessary for a complete understanding of some phenomena.

The Primary Argument Against Reductionism Is That