Mr. Ho talked with Mr. Tarr, who ran a business called Roscali Roofing. Mr. Ho agreed to pay Tarr $250 for the repair of his roof. In time, Gene Fix, Tarr's employee, came to Mr. Ho's and worked on the roof. Fix used the wrong material in the repairs, which made all his effort worthless; during the next rain the roof leaked as before. Which of the following is true?
A) If Tarr doesn't pay Fix, Fix could sue Ho directly for his pay because he worked on Ho's roof.
B) Ho could successfully sue only Fix or Tarr for breach of contract, whichever he chooses, but not both.
C) Ho could successfully sue Fix and Tarr for breach of contract since they were both connected with the job.
D) Ho could successfully sue only Tarr for breach of contract.
E) Ho could only sue Tarr because he is the one who did a poor job of the roof.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q72: In Moss v. Chin, Chin's insurer, ICBC,
Q73: In Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club
Q74: Back in the days when people in
Q75: Selling the contents of the house in
Q76: A and B entered into a contract
Q78: Which of the following is false with
Q79: Patrick paid the seller of a car
Q80: Although Zlotnic had been in business a
Q105: Privity of contract is a principle that
Q113: Misunderstanding occurs when each party has a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents