Selling the contents of the house in preparation for a move to a condominium, Mr. Lotski sold an antique desk to a Mr. Rogers who paid by a cheque later returned N.S.F. (not sufficient funds) . Lotski later learned that Rogers had sold the desk to Mrs. Lee for cash, which he took and then disappeared. Who is entitled to the desk if the court holds that the first contract between Lotski and Rogers is voidable?
A) Rogers
B) Lotski
C) Lotski but he must pay compensation to Lee
D) Lee
E) Lee but she must pay compensation to Lotski
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q70: Lars Jepsen, a fisherman from Tofino, regularly
Q71: In Dansway International Transport Ltd. v. Lesway
Q72: In Moss v. Chin, Chin's insurer, ICBC,
Q73: In Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club
Q74: Back in the days when people in
Q76: A and B entered into a contract
Q77: Mr. Ho talked with Mr. Tarr, who
Q78: Which of the following is false with
Q79: Patrick paid the seller of a car
Q80: Although Zlotnic had been in business a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents