What was the result in Smith v.Sears,Roebuck & Co.,the case in the text involving whether an employer would be held liable under the Fair Credit Reporting Act for its employee's actions in obtaining a consumer credit report for other than permissible purposes?
A) That the employer was liable because it had the primary responsibility for ensuring the sanctity of credit reports.
B) That the employer was strictly liable based on an agency theory.
C) That an employer could never be held liable for such an offense.
D) That under the facts presented,the employer would not be held liable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: Fact Pattern 5-1
Candy owns a nail and
Q43: Fact Pattern 5-1
Candy owns a nail and
Q45: Under which of the following circumstances may
Q47: In agreeing to act on behalf of
Q48: Fact pattern 5-2
Billy owns a used car
Q51: Agency by estoppel creates an agency relationship
Q53: When a third party reasonably believes that
Q54: If an agent enters into an agreement
Q56: Apparent authority may be based on which
Q62: Discuss the elements that are considered in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents