When the subject of an investigation has been accused of misconduct, establishing a morally acceptable rationalization might allow the accused to reconcile his actions with his conscience. Which of the following is not an example of an acceptable rationalization?
A) The accused has been unfairly treated by his management.
B) The accused felt that he needed to get back at someone in the organization.
C) The accused is a bad person by nature.
D) The accused engaged in the misconduct for the benefit of others.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The rationalization that the accused is a bad person by nature does not excuse the misconduct or provide a valid justification for it. It is important to focus on the actions and motivations behind the misconduct rather than simply labeling the accused as a bad person. Acceptable rationalizations might include circumstances beyond the accused's control, pressure from superiors, or a perceived benefit to the organization.

When the Subject of an Investigation Has Been Accused of Misconduct