Which of the Following Was the Result in Labaj V

Which of the following was the result in Labaj v.VanHouten,the case in the text involving whether in order to find an employer negligent for failing to protect an employee from being attacked by a dog,the dog had to have abnormally dangerous propensities?

A) That an employer had no duties in regard to an animal on the premises because of the rule that animals cannot be absolutely controlled under any circumstances.
B) That an employer can be held strictly liable for failing to protect an employee from getting attached by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.
C) That an employer cannot be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attached by a dog unless the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.
D) That an employer can be negligent for failing to protect an employee from getting attached by a dog, even if the dog is not known to possess abnormally dangerous propensities.