Which of the Following Was the Result in Lev V

Which of the following was the result in Lev v.Beverly Enterprises-Massachusetts,Inc.,the case in the text involving whether an employer could e held liable for negligence when an intoxicated employee causes an automobile accident after leaving a restaurant where he discussed work with his supervisor over drinks?

A) That based upon the principle of vicarious liability, the employer was liable to the plaintiff injured in the accident.
B) That under an employer-hose theory, the employer was liable to the plaintiff injured in the accident.
C) That based upon violations of its own alcohol-abuse policy, the employer was liable to the plaintiff injured in the accident.
D) That the employer was not liable to the plaintiff injured in the accident.