A proper "frisk" under the stopandfrisk rules established by Terry v.Ohio:

Question

A proper "frisk" under the stop­and­frisk rules established by Terry v.Ohio:

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court established that a "stop and frisk" is a limited search for weapons that can be conducted if the police officer has reasonable suspicion that the suspect is involved in criminal activity. The frisk, which is a pat-down of the suspect's outer clothing, is only allowed if the officer feels something that could be a weapon during the pat-down. Therefore, choice A is the best answer. Choice B is incorrect because the officer does not need to be certain that the suspect has a weapon, only that there is reasonable suspicion based on specific facts. Choice C is incorrect because the frisk is limited to the suspect's outer clothing and does not extend to surrounding areas. Choice D is incorrect because probable cause is not required for a frisk, only reasonable suspicion.

A Proper "Frisk" Under the Stop­and­frisk Rules Established by Terry

A Proper "Frisk" Under the Stopandfrisk Rules Established by Terry