The Supreme Court has ruled that a state statute which permits police to require a suspect disclose his identity during a Terry stop or face prosecution for failing to answer is:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, the Supreme Court held that requiring a suspect to disclose his or her name during a Terry stop did not violate the Fourth or Fifth Amendments. The Court reasoned that the disclosure of one's name presents no significant Fourth Amendment interests, and that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only protects against compelled testimonial communications, which do not include the mere act of identifying oneself. Therefore, the state statute is constitutional because it is rationally related to the purpose and practical demands of a Terry stop.

The Supreme Court Has Ruled That a State Statute Which