According to Michigan v.Sitz (1990) ,do DWI roadblocks constitute unlawful stops?
A) Yes,they are unlawful stops unless the individual stopped has already demonstrated some subjective symptoms of driving while under the influence.
B) No,they are not unlawful as long as the police have a warrant to search 'all vehicles' suspected of DWI suspects.
C) Yes,they are unlawful based on the Fourth Amendment 'unreasonable' test.
D) No,they are not unlawful because there is a compelling interest related to public safety.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: Since stops and frisks take place in
Q29: In Maryland v.Wilson,the case where police removed
Q30: Outer clothing pat-downs do not constitute Fourth
Q30: Stop and frisks impact a greater number
Q32: Stops and frisks are more invasive than
Q34: According to the Supreme Court opinion in
Q35: Which of the following are legitimate purposes
Q36: Which of the following does not implicate
Q37: According to the Supreme Court's opinion in
Q38: The Supreme Court has ruled that a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents