According to the Supreme Court,a police officer is permitted to use drug sniffing dogs during a routine stop for a traffic violation:
A) because the driver of the car does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy while lawfully stopped.
B) only if the officer can establish probable cause that the driver has contraband in the car.
C) only if the officer has probable cause and a search warrant.
D) only if the driver has consented to the search.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: According to the privacy doctrine, the Fourth
Q24: In California v.Ciraolo (1986),a case involving the
Q25: Which of the following is NOT an
Q26: Which of the following places is/are not
Q27: The special protection accorded by the Fourth
Q28: In Florida v.Bostick (1991),the court had to
Q29: In practice, searches and seizures sometimes serve
Q30: In California v.Hodari D.(1991),a juvenile dropped the
Q32: The point at which an actual seizure
Q39: The Fourth Amendment only protects against invasions
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents