In California v.Hodari D.(1991) ,a juvenile dropped the drugs he was carrying before actually being 'seized' by police.What was the key issue in this case?
A) The prosecution said since the defendant was being pursued chased by the police,the chase itself constituted a 'seizure' under the Fourth Amendment.Thus charging them with possession of the drugs was legitimate.
B) That the recovery of the drugs was considered 'constructive possession.'
C) That the real issue was that officers had actually seen him throw the drugs away.
D) That he was 'not' actually seized under the Fourth Amendment until he had actually been subdued or submitted to the police,thus the drugs were not admissible.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: According to the privacy doctrine, the Fourth
Q25: Which of the following is NOT an
Q26: Which of the following places is/are not
Q27: The special protection accorded by the Fourth
Q28: In Florida v.Bostick (1991),the court had to
Q29: According to the Supreme Court,a police officer
Q29: In practice, searches and seizures sometimes serve
Q32: The point at which an actual seizure
Q35: In California v.Hodari D.(1991),the Supreme Court ruled:
A)a
Q39: The Fourth Amendment only protects against invasions
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents