Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract,the parol evidence rule would prohibit evidence of:
A) prior or contemporaneous oral statements that alter,contradict,or add to the terms of the contract
B) prior or contemporaneous oral statements that explain ambiguities in the contract
C) subsequent oral statements that modify the contract
D) A and C
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q66: John is president and sole shareholder of
Q67: Mandy enters a written agreement to rent
Q68: Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale
Q69: Helen goes to the bank to obtain
Q70: Under the parol evidence rule,which of the
Q72: Buyer and Seller orally agree to a
Q73: Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale
Q74: Sam and Betty sign a written contract
Q75: In December,2001,Mark signs a written consulting agreement
Q76: Two adults enter into an oral contract
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents