Mandy enters a written agreement to rent a motor home for six days.Persons under age 25 are not permitted to drive it under terms of the written agreement.Mandy calls the rental company on the third day and asks if Dave,age 23,can drive it.The rental company says Dave can drive it if Mandy pays an extra $10 per day when he returns the motor home.When Dave drives in to return the motor home,the rental company refuses to return the $500 deposit because the written contract says any breach of the contract will result in the forfeiture of the entire damage deposit.Which is true?
A) Mandy loses because of the parol evidence rule.
B) Mandy loses because he had not yet paid the $10 extra per day.
C) Mandy wins because the parol evidence does not apply.
D) Mandy loses because of the Statute of Frauds.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q62: What is "parol evidence?"
A) Oral evidence that
Q63: Which of the following is not a
Q64: Jack and Jill were discussing business over
Q65: A contract for the purchase of a
Q66: John is president and sole shareholder of
Q68: Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale
Q69: Helen goes to the bank to obtain
Q70: Under the parol evidence rule,which of the
Q71: Assuming the existence of a complete and
Q72: Buyer and Seller orally agree to a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents