A restraint that is automatically in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act is said to be a per se violation.

Name: A restraint that is automatically in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act is said to be a per se violation.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.8 (49 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A per se violation refers to a restraint that is deemed illegal under the Sherman Act without requiring an inquiry into its actual effects on competition. Examples of per se violations include price fixing, market allocation agreements, and bid rigging.

A Restraint That Is Automatically in Violation of Section 1